Extra credit

1. The man in the photo was pushed into the track trying to stop a fight. A train was on its way and eventually killed him. A photographer was near by and tried to use his flash from his camera to stop the train. 
2. He took the photo to try to warn the train conductor to stop the train with his flash.
3. No. The photographer should have rushed to try to help the man up from the tracks. 
4. No. The best thing he could have done was ave the man's life. To me a person's life is more important than having a good picture.
5. I once again disagree because it is like making a movie about someone dying and you can watch every second of their death. It is kind of disgusting that they put the death of a man on the cover for millions to see.
6. To a photojournalist-Taking and documenting the picture and what happened is probably ,ore important. To me-Stoping the bad things from happening would be more important because i would rather save a life than make money from someones death that I could have prevented. 
7. Yes it is completely ethical. To me it would be unethical to not involve yourself in a bad situation when you could help someone. Photojournalists should just be documenters, they should be doers as well in that they save and help not just take a picture and share. 
8. They should never avoid influencing bad things from  happening. They should always try their best to help those people and take a picture of them when they are done being helped. 
9. He should not have taken the picture of he had enough time to save the man. You can't document a death without trying to stop it first.